ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020
Exploring Deep Learning for Complex Trait Genomic Prediction in Polyploid Outcrossing Species.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Analysis of SNPs and Structural Variations via High-depth Whole-genome Sequencing Reveals the Genetic Architecture and Optimizes Genomic Prediction in Chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- 2NPLGBM: a genomic model that merges the strengths of classical and machine learning methods in genomic prediction.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Genotyping: Innovations Driving Plant Genomic Improvement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Critical evaluation of the theory and practice of feed-forward neural networks for genomic prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Using genomic selection to examine subgenome dominance and epistasis in allopolyploid strawberry.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics insights into plant genomic imprinting: approaches, challenges, and future perspectives.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Review
- Genomic prediction of feed efficiency in boars by deep learning.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Haplotype-based autoencoders can reduce the dataset dimension and estimate haplotype block effects in different crop species.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Machine learning for genomic prediction of growth traits in aquaculture: a case study of the Australasian snapper (Chrysophrys auratus).BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of SNP-weighted, Bayesian, and machine learning models for genomic prediction in Holstein cattle.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Integrative Machine Learning Approaches for Identifying Loci Associated with Anthracnose Resistance in Strawberry.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Climate-Resilient Crops: Integrating AI, Multi-Omics, and Advanced Phenotyping to Address Global Agricultural and Societal Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Disentangling soybean GxE effects in an integrated genomic prediction and machine learning-GWAS workflow.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Multifactor Analysis of a Genome-Wide Selection System inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
- EBMGP: a deep learning model for genomic prediction based on Elastic Net feature selection and bidirectional encoder representations from transformer's embedding and multi-head attention pooling.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- ExAutoGP: Enhancing Genomic Prediction Stability and Interpretability with Automated Machine Learning and SHAP.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Improving wheat grain yield genomic prediction accuracy using historical data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP) is the procedure whereby the genetic merits of untested candidates are predicted using genome wide marker information. Although numerous examples of GP exist in plants and animals, applications to polyploid organisms are still scarce, partly due to limited genome resources and the complexity of this system. Deep learning (DL) techniques comprise a heterogeneous collection of machine learning algorithms that have excelled at many prediction tasks. A potential advantage of DL for GP over standard linear model methods is that DL can potentially take into account all genetic interactions, including dominance and epistasis, which are expected to be of special relevance in most polyploids. In this study, we evaluated the predictive accuracy of linear and DL techniques in two important small fruits or berries: strawberry and blueberry. The two datasets contained a total of 1,358 allopolyploid strawberry (2n=8x=112) and 1,802 autopolyploid blueberry (2n=4x=48) individuals, genotyped for 9,908 and 73,045 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, respectively, and phenotyped for five agronomic traits each. DL depends on numerous parameters that influence performance and optimizing hyperparameter values can be a critical step. Here we show that interactions between hyperparameter combinations should be expected and that the number of convolutional filters and regularization in the first layers can have an important effect on model performance. In terms of genomic prediction, we did not find an advantage of DL over linear model methods, except when the epistasis component was important. Linear Bayesian models were better than convolutional neural networks for the full additive architecture, whereas the opposite was observed under strong epistasis. However, by using a parameterization capable of taking into account these non-linear effects, Bayesian linear models can match or exceed the predictive accuracy of DL. A semiautomatic implementation of the DL pipeline is available at https://github.com/lauzingaretti/deepGP/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.