Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32117287›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Bidirectional Crosstalk Between Cancer Stem Cells and Immune Cell Subsets.

Luise Müller, Antje Tunger, Ioana Plesca, Rebekka Wehner, Achim Temme, Dana Westphal, Friedegund Meier, Michael Bachmann, Marc Schmitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Unveiling the mechanisms and challenges of cancer drug resistance.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luise MüllerFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Immunology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Antje TungerFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Immunology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ioana PlescaFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Immunology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Rebekka WehnerFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Immunology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Achim TemmeNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Dana WestphalDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Friedegund MeierNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael BachmannNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marc SchmitzFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Immunology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), also known as tumor-initiating cells, are characterized by an increased capacity for self-renewal, multipotency, and tumor initiation. While CSCs represent only a small proportion of the tumor mass, they significantly account for metastatic dissemination and tumor recurrence, thus making them attractive targets for therapy. Due to their ability to sustain in dormancy, chemo- and radiotherapy often fail to eliminate cancer cells with stemness properties. Recent advances in the understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) illustrated the importance of the immune contexture, determining the response to therapy and clinical outcome of patients. In this context, CSCs exhibit special properties to escape the recognition by innate and adaptive immunity and shape the TME into an immunosuppressive, pro-tumorigenic landscape. As CSCs sculpt the immune contexture, the phenotype and functional properties of the tumor-infiltrating immune cells in turn influence the differentiation and phenotype of tumor cells. In this review, we summarize recent studies investigating main immunomodulatory properties of CSCs and their underlying molecular mechanisms as well as the impact of immune cells on cancer cells with stemness properties. A deeper understanding of this bidirectional crosstalk shaping the immunological landscape and determining therapeutic responses will facilitate the improvement of current treatment modalities and the design of innovative strategies to precisely target CSCs.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell DedifferentiationHumansImmunomodulationImmunotherapyMacrophagesMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsNeoplastic Stem CellsPhenotypeT-LymphocytesTumor EscapeTumor Microenvironmentcancer stem cellsmacrophagesmyeloid-derived suppressor cellsT cellstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32117287
PMCPMC7013084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.