Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32117113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Defensive Symbioses in Social Insects Can Inform Human Health and Agriculture.

Jennifer R Bratburd, Rachel A Arango, Heidi A Horn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Host Susceptibility ModulatesFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer R BratburdDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Rachel A ArangoForest Products Laboratory, United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Madison, WI, United States.
Heidi A HornDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USForest Products Laboratory · US

Funding

Microbial Pathogenesis &Host Responses Training ProgramT32AI055397 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, BRUCE STEVEN · 2003 to 2024
$5.5M
Novel therapeutic agents from the bacterial symbionts of Brazilian invertebratesU19TW009872 · FIC · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI CLARDY, JON, PUPO, MONICA T · 2014 to 2018
$4.4M
FIC NIH HHS U19 TW009872NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI055397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social animals are among the most successful organisms on the planet and derive many benefits from living in groups, including facilitating the evolution of agriculture. However, living in groups increases the risk of disease transmission in social animals themselves and the cultivated crops upon which they obligately depend. Social insects offer an interesting model to compare to human societies, in terms of how insects manage disease within their societies and with their agricultural symbionts. As living in large groups can help the spread of beneficial microbes as well as pathogens, we examine the role of defensive microbial symbionts in protecting the host from pathogens. We further explore how beneficial microbes may influence other pathogen defenses including behavioral and immune responses, and how we can use insect systems as models to inform on issues relating to human health and agriculture.

Indexed as

colonization resistancedefensive symbiosisgut microbiomeinsect agriculturemodel systemssocial immunitysocial insects and humans

Identifiers

PMID32117113
PMCPMC7020198
OpenAlexW3004831664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.