Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32117096›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Scent of a Killer: Microbial Volatilome and Its Role in the Biological Control of Plant Pathogens.

Bruno Tilocca, Aocheng Cao, Quirico Migheli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
27.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dual Evidence ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biocontrol Potential and Functional Characteristics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. EngineeringAIMS microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Volatile organic compounds from Pichia kluyveri inhibit the cacao pathogen Moniliophthora roreri.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Co-Culture ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno TiloccaDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Aocheng CaoInstitute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Quirico MigheliDipartimento di Agraria and NRD-Nucleo di Ricerca sulla Desertificazione, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of synthetic fungicides represents the most common strategy to control plant pathogens. Excessive and/or long-term distribution of chemicals is responsible for increased levels of environmental pollution, as well as adverse health consequence to humans and animals. These issues are deeply influencing public perception, as reflected by the increasing demand for safer and eco-friendly agricultural commodities and their by-products. A steadily increasing number of research efforts is now devoted to explore the use of safer and innovative approaches to control plant pathogens. The use of microorganisms as biological control agents (BCAs) represents one of the most durable and promising strategies. Among the panoply of microbial mechanisms exerted by BCAs, the production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) represents an intriguing issue, mostly exploitable in circumstances where a direct contact between the pathogen and its antagonist is not practicable. VOCs are potentially produced by all living microorganisms, and may be active in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic oomycetes, fungi, and bacteria by means of antimicrobial activity and/or other cross-talk interactions. Their biological effects, the reduced residuals in the environment and on agricultural commodities, and the ease of application in different agricultural systems make the use of VOCs a promising and sustainable approach to replace synthetic fungicides in the control of plant pathogens. In this review, we focus on VOCs produced by bacteria and fungi and on their role in the cross-talk existing between the plant pathogens and their host. Biologic systemic effect of the microbial volatile blends on both pathogen and host plant cells is also briefly reviewed.

Indexed as

antagonistbiocontroleco-friendly agriculturevolatile organic metabolitesyeast

Identifiers

PMID32117096
PMCPMC7018762
OpenAlexW3000372525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.