SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2020
Added Value of Impact Microindentation in the Evaluation of Bone Fragility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Bone and joint quality remains impaired in long-term controlled acromegaly: an HR-pQCT study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Bone Fragility: Time to Address the Matrix.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Article
- Objective selection of bone mimetic materials using impact microindentation.Journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Pentosidine and Bone Properties in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Skin Autofluorescence May Contribute to Prediction of Low Bone Quality in Type 1 Diabetes-A Clinical Cross-Sectional Study.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Article
- Onlay Fixation With an All-Suture Anchor Provides Sufficient Biomechanical Stability for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- EndoCompass Project: Research Roadmap for Calcium and Bone Endocrinology.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2025Review
- Chronic Kidney Disease with Mineral Bone Disorder and Vascular Calcification: An Overview.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Obesity and Skeletal Fragility.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
- Safety Outcomes of Impact Microindentation: A Prospective Observational Study in the Netherlands.JBMR plus · 2023Article
- Current and Emerging Markers and Tools Used in the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder in Non-Dialysis Adult Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Management of fracture risk in CKD-traditional and novel approaches.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- Review
- Bone material strength index as measured by in vivo impact microindentation is normal in subjects with high-energy trauma fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022Article
- Fracture risk assessment in diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Evidence of impaired bone quality in men with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Endocrine connections · 2021Article
- Bone Material Strength Index as Measured by Impact Microindentation is Low in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Basis of Predicting and Preventing Lower Limb Stress Fractures During Arduous Training.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- Duration of Bisphosphonate Drug Holidays in Osteoporosis Patients: A Narrative Review of the Evidence and Considerations for Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and the prediction of fracture risk is the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A low BMD is clearly associated with increased fracture risk, but BMD is not the only determinant of bone strength, particularly in secondary osteoporosis and metabolic bone disorders in which components other than BMD are affected and DXA often underestimates true fracture risk. Material properties of bone which significantly contribute to bone strength have become evaluable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.