Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32116821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2019

The Neural Mechanisms of Associative Memory Revisited: fMRI Evidence from Implicit Contingency Learning.

Marco P Caviezel, Carolin F Reichert, Dena Sadeghi Bahmani, Christoph Linnemann, Caroline Liechti, Oliver Bieri, Stefan Borgwardt, Thomas Leyhe, Tobias Melcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Why art? The role of arts in arts and health.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco P CaviezelCenter of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Carolin F ReichertTransfaculty Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dena Sadeghi BahmaniCenter of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph LinnemannCenter of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Caroline LiechtiCenter of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Oliver BieriDivision of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefan BorgwardtTranslational Psychiatry Unit (TPU), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas LeyheCenter of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias MelcherCenter of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature describes a basic neurofunctional antagonism between episodic memory encoding and retrieval with opposed patterns of neural activation and deactivation, particularly in posterior midline regions. This has been coined the encoding/retrieval (E/R) flip. The present fMRI study uses an innovative task paradigm to further elucidate neurofunctional relations of encoding and retrieval in associative memory. Thereby, memory encoding is implemented as implicit (non-deliberate) cognitive process, whereas the prior literature focused mainly on explicit encoding. Moreover, instead of defining brain activations related to successful (vs. unsuccessful) memory performance, the task paradigm provides proper no-memory baseline conditions. More specifically, the encoding task includes trials with non-contingent (not learnable) stimulus combinations, while the retrieval task uses trials with a simple matching exercise with no mnemonic requirements. The analyses revealed circumscribed activation in the posterior middle cingulate cortex (pMCC) together with prominent deactivation in the anterior insula cortex (aIC) as core neural substrate of implicit memory encoding. Thereby, the pMCC exhibited positive functional connectivity to the hippocampus. Memory retrieval was related to an activation pattern exactly opposed to memory encoding with deactivation in the pMCC and activation in the aIC, while the aIC additionally exhibited a negative (i.e., arguably inhibitive) functional connectivity to the pMCC. Important to note, the observed pattern of activations/de-activations in the pMCC appears to conflict with prevalent E/R flip findings. The outlined results and their (alleged) discrepancies with prior study reports are discussed primarily in the context of the default mode network's functioning and its context-sensitive regulation. Finally, we point out the relevance of the present work for the understanding and further investigation of the neurofunctional aberrations occurring during normal and pathological aging.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseassociation memorycingulate cortexcontingency learningdefault mode networkfMRIfunctional connectivityimplicit memory

Identifiers

PMID32116821
PMCPMC7008231
OpenAlexW3004620280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.