Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32116392›Full record

ArticleMetrologia2019

Next-generation crossover-free quantum Hall arrays with superconducting interconnections.

Mattias Kruskopf, Albert F Rigosi, Alireza R Panna, Martina Marzano, Dinesh Patel, Hanbyul Jin, David B Newell, Randolph E Elmquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metrologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysing quantized resistance behaviour in graphene CorbinoJournal of physics D: Applied physics · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison between Graphene and GaAs Quantized Hall Devices with a Dual Probe.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2020
    Article
  13. The Quantum Hall Effect in the Era of the New SI.Semiconductor science and technology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mattias Kruskopf *National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Albert F Rigosi *National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Alireza R PannaNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Martina MarzanoPolitecnico di Torino, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Turin, Italy.
Dinesh PatelDepartment of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Hanbyul JinNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
David B NewellNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Randolph E ElmquistNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents precision measurements of quantized Hall array resistance devices using superconducting, crossover-free, multiple interconnections as well as graphene split contacts. These new techniques successfully eliminate the accumulation of internal resistances and leakage currents that typically occur at interconnections and crossing leads between interconnected devices. As a result, a scalable quantized Hall resistance array is obtained with a nominal value that is as precise and stable as that from single-element quantized Hall resistance standards.

Indexed as

epitaxial graphenemultiple connectionquantized Hall array resistance standardsquantum Hall effectsplit contactssuperconducting contacts

Identifiers

PMID32116392
PMCPMC7047890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.