ArticleJournal of food science and technology2020
Optimization study for refractance window drying process of Langra variety mango.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Lipid Changes During the Drying Process ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Conductive hydro drying of ripened papaya: optimization and product characterization.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Developing mango powders by foam mat drying technology.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Improvement of phytochemical and quality characteristics ofFood science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Drying behaviour and optimization of drying conditions of pineapple puree and slices using refractance window drying technology.Journal of food science and technology · 2022Article
- Optimization of drying conditions for Jackfruit pulp using Refractance Window Drying technology.Food science & nutrition · 2022Article
- Factors Affecting the Time and Process of CMC Drying Using Refractance Window or Conductive Hydro-Drying.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractance window (RW) drying of mango pulp has shown good quality retention compared to conventional drying methods. Different pulp thickness (2, 3 and 4 mm) and drying temperature (85, 90 and 95 °C) were optimized for RW drying of mango pulp for responses as drying time, ascorbic acid, total phenolics content (TPC) and hardness of mango leather. Face-centered central composite design was performed for optimization using Design-Expert software. RW drying of 2 mm thick mango pulp took the shortest drying time, however lower ascorbic acid and TPC were determined as compared to 3 mm and 4 mm thick pulp mango leather. Hardness of RW dried mango leather was determined to be in the chewable range as 3.62-5.33 N. The optimum solution generated for RW drying temperature and pulp thickness was 95 °C and 2.49 mm, respectively. The drying time was 22.5 min with high quality retention in terms of ascorbic acid, TPC and hardness as 62.33 mg/100 g DW, 7.72 mg GAE/g DW and 4.60 N respectively of dried product with desirability function obtained was 0.969. More nutrients were preserved in mango leather as well as microstructure of mango powder was observed as smooth and flaky with uniform thickness of powder particles with RW drying process when compared with tray and oven drying at 95 °C drying temperature and 2.50 mm mango pulp thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.