ArticleIEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement2019
Comparison between NIST Graphene and AIST GaAs Quantized Hall Devices.
Article in IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Companion guide to the revised technical guidelines for reliable dc measurements of the quantized Hall resistance for graphene-based devices.Metrologia · 2026Article
- Graphene's Role in Advancing Quantum Electrical Standards.Journal of applied physics · 2025Article
- Review
- Onsager-Casimir frustration from resistance anisotropy in graphene quantum Hall devices.Physical review. B · 2021Article
- Analysing quantized resistance behaviour in graphene CorbinoJournal of physics D: Applied physics · 2020Article
- Analytical determination of atypical quantized resistances in graphenePhysica. B, Condensed matter · 2020Article
- Comparison between Graphene and GaAs Quantized Hall Devices with a Dual Probe.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2020Article
- The Quantum Hall Effect in the Era of the New SI.Semiconductor science and technology · 2019Article
- Comparison between NIST Graphene and AIST GaAs Quantized Hall Devices.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several graphene quantized Hall resistance (QHR) devices manufactured at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) were compared to GaAs QHR devices and a 100 Ω standard resistor at the National Institute for Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). Measurements of the 100 Ω resistor with the graphene QHR devices agreed within 5 nΩ/Ω of the values for the 100 Ω resistor obtained through GaAs measurements. The electron density of the graphene devices was adjusted at AIST to restore device properties such that operation was possible at low magnetic flux densities of 4 T to 6 T. This adjustment was accomplished with a functionalization method utilized at NIST, allowing for consistent tunability of the graphene QHR devices with simple annealing. Such a method replaces older and less predictable methods for adjusting graphene for metrological suitability. The milestone results demonstrate the ease with which graphene can be used to make resistance comparison measurements among many National Metrology Institutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.