Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32116309›Full record

Trial reportJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills.

Philip D Harvey, Lize Tibiriçá, Peter Kallestrup, Sara J Czaja

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04679441 (), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04679441 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

: A Novel Computer-Based Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program

TypeinterventionalSponsori-Function, Inc.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Healthy AgingArmsThe Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program, Brain HQ Double Decision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Everyday memory and metacognitive intervention: a randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philip D HarveyUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine; i-Function; pharvey@miami.edu.
Lize Tibiriçái-Function; Albizu University.
Peter Kallestrupi-Function.
Sara J CzajaUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine; i-Function; Weill-Cornell Medical Center.

Funding

A Technology-Based Novel Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program for Adults with and without Cognitive Impairments. Develop the next generation software solution.R44AG057238 · NIA · I-FUNCTION, INC. · PI KALLESTRUP, PETER · 2020 to 2021
$1.6M
A novel computer-based functional skills assessment and training programR43AG057238 · NIA · I-FUNCTION, INC. · PI CZAJA, SARA J, HARVEY, PHILIP D. · 2017 to 2018
$450k
NIA NIH HHS R43 AG057238NIA NIH HHS R44 AG057238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, many functional skills are technology-based, so development of a technology-based training program has broad importance. Here we present a computerized functional skills training program that was paired in half of the participants with a commercially available cognitive training (CCT) program. Non-impaired older individuals (NC) aged 60+ (n=45) and similarly aged individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n=50) were randomized to receive 12 weeks of twice-weekly computerized functional skills training (CFST) or 12 weeks of twice-weekly sessions split between CCT and CFST. Skills trained were use of an ATM; internet banking; ticket kiosk; telephone and internet prescription refill; medication management; and internet shopping. As with previous functional capacity assessments, we focus on completion time for each simulation. 51 participants completed the training program, either by mastering all 6 tasks (34) or completing 12 weeks of training. 44 more participants completed 4 or more training sessions so they were also analyzed for improvement up to their last training session. Completion time for all 6 tests significantly improved from the baseline assessment to the final training session in both groups of participants (all p<0.001 with an average improvement in task completion time of 45%). Further, there was no differential improvement in MCI and NC in the 6 tests from baseline to end of training (all t<1.66, all p>0.12). Finally, combined CCT plus CFST did not differ from CSFT alone on any of the percent-change score measures (all t<1.64, all p>0.11). Both NC and MCI groups evidenced substantial improvements in performance. CCT supplementation led to similar functional gains with half as many training sessions. The NC participants proceeded through the training fairly rapidly even without CCT supplementation; MCI participants required more training but learned equivalently. These findings suggest that even in cases with memory impairments, functional skills can be efficiently learned with training.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTest Taking Skills

Identifiers

PMID32116309
PMCPMC7986486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.