Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32116218›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2020

CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.

Lukas Lambert, Jiri Jahoda, Gabriela Grusova, Pavel Hrabak, Ales Novotny, Andrea Burgetova

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukas LambertDepartment of Radiology, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri JahodaDepartment of Radiology, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Gabriela GrusovaFourth Department of Medicine, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel HrabakFourth Department of Medicine, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ales NovotnyFourth Department of Medicine, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andrea BurgetovaDepartment of Radiology, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.

methodsThree gastroenterologists systematically reported on the presence of internal hemorrhoids in patients with incomplete colonoscopy, for whom they considered a subsequent CTC. For 44 patients with internal hemorrhoids revealed by optical colonoscopy, an age- and gender-matched cohort of 66 patients with normal findings in the rectum was selected. Endoluminal and transaxial CTC views of the rectum were evaluated for the presence of internal hemorrhoids, the anal verge prominence, asymmetry, and cushion-like appearance on a Likert scale by two experienced radiologists and two gastroenterologists.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for identification of internal hemorrhoids were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70), respectively. The radiologists showed a better specificity, the gastroenterologists a slightly better sensitivity. When only the rating "very likely" was considered as positive, the specificity rose to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62). The interobserver agreement was fair. The best predictor of the presence of hemorrhoids was a prominent anal verge in the supine position (OR=1.789, 95% CI, 1.267-2.525). The difference between supine and prone positions in the evaluated features in patients with internal hemorrhoids was not significant.

conclusionCTC has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids, if the rater is confident in detecting them. Internal hemorrhoids do not substantially change their shape between prone and supine positions.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsColonography, Computed TomographicFemaleHemorrhoidsHumansMaleProspective StudiesRectumReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySex Factors

Identifiers

PMID32116218
PMCPMC7051267
OpenAlexW3007977904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.