ArticleBirth defects research2020
Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.
Article in Birth defects research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Down Syndrome in British Maternity Care: Mothers' Experiences of Prenatal Testing and Receiving a Prenatal or Postnatal Diagnosis.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
- Rethinking the Burden of Traditional Informed Consent Prior to Prenatal Genetic Screening.The Hastings Center report · 2025Article
- Patient interest in and clinician reservations on polygenic embryo screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Patient experiences with prenatal cell-free DNA screening in a safety net setting.Prenatal diagnosis · 2024Article
- Divergence Between Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Polygenic Embryo Screening: A Qualitative Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Never "totally prepared": Support groups on helping families prepare for a child with a genetic condition.Journal of community genetics · 2023Article
- Down Syndrome: how to communicate the diagnosis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Attitudes of Filipino parents of children with Down syndrome on noninvasive prenatal testing.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
As prenatal genetic testing technologies have become both easier and more accessible, women are increasingly choosing prenatal genetic testing for a reason that is largely unexamined in the clinical literature: preparation. This reasoning, offered not only from pregnant women but frequently from testing laboratories and health care providers, reflects long-held assumptions that prenatal genetic results-properly delivered and followed with information, clinical surveillance, and/or social supports-prepare families for a child with a genetic condition, and even improve health and social outcomes for children and families. But these assumptions remain unexamined, since there are no clear definitions or recommendations for prenatal preparation. Preparation may refer to several overlapping ways in which prenatal information may change parents' approach to the rest of the pregnancy, including: (a) clinical activities, including surveillance, interventions, and delivery planning; (b) social and informational support, such as interacting with patient support groups and gathering information about quality of life; and (c) psychological "coping" or adjustments to the reality of raising a child with a genetic condition. These meanings and activities intersect and influence one another and form a foundation for postnatal family adaptation, but they are rarely parsed out in studies examining the impact of prenatal diagnosis. Based on previous work delineating conceptual models as middle terms between theory and reality, we are building a conceptual model that incorporates an empirical understanding of meanings and actions encompassed by prenatal preparation. Comparing diverse families' expectations with the resources they are offered can identify (mis)matches between priorities and approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.