Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32115879›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020

Nasal glucagon as a viable alternative for treating insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in Japanese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: A phase 3 randomized crossover study.

Munehide Matsuhisa, Yasushi Takita, Risa Nasu, Yukiko Nagai, Kenji Ohwaki, Hirotaka Nagashima

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Munehide MatsuhisaDiabetes Therapeutics and Research Centre, Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Yasushi TakitaMedicine Development Unit-Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Risa NasuMedicine Development Unit-Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Yukiko NagaiMedicine Development Unit-Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Kenji OhwakiMedicine Development Unit-Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Hirotaka NagashimaShinjuku Research Park Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Eli Lilly (Japan) · JPShinjuku College of Information Technology · JPTokushima University · JP

Funding

This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare nasal glucagon (NG) with intramuscular glucagon (IMG) for the treatment of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in Japanese patients with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis phase 3, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period crossover non-inferiority study enrolled Japanese adults with T1DM or T2DM on insulin therapy, with glycated haemoglobin levels ≤86 mmol/mol (≤10%). After ≥8 hours of fasting, hypoglycaemia was induced with human regular insulin (intravenous infusion). Patients received NG 3 mg or IMG 1 mg approximately 5 minutes after insulin termination. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving treatment success [plasma glucose (PG) increase to ≥3.9 mmol/L (≥70 mg/dL) or ≥1.1 mmol/L (≥20 mg/dL) increase from the PG nadir within 30 minutes of receiving glucagon]. Non-inferiority was declared if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference in the percentage of patients achieving treatment success (IMG minus NG) was <10%.

resultsSeventy-five patients with T1DM (n = 34) or T2DM (n = 41) were enrolled; 72 patients (50 men, 22 women) received ≥1 study drug dose (T1DM, n = 33; T2DM, n = 39). Sixty-eight patients completed the study and were evaluable. All NG- and IMG-treated patients achieved treatment success (treatment arm difference: 0%; upper limit of two-sided 95% CI 1.47%); NG met prespecified conditions defining non-inferiority versus IMG. Glucagon was rapidly absorbed after both nasal and intramuscular administration; PG profiles were similar between administration routes during the first 60 minutes post dose. Study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events affecting >2 patients were rhinalgia, increased blood pressure, nausea, ear pain and vomiting in the NG group, and nausea and vomiting in the IMG group.

conclusionNasal glucagon was non-inferior to IMG for successful treatment of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in Japanese patients with T1DM/T2DM, supporting use of NG as a rescue treatment for severe hypoglycaemia.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypoglycemiaAdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesFemaleGlucagonHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinJapanMaleBlood GlucoseGlucagonHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinglucagonhypoglycaemiapharmacodynamicspharmacokineticstype 1 diabetestype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32115879
PMCPMC7318639
OpenAlexW3010399593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.