Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32115875›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2020

Adolescents Obtaining Abortion Without Parental Consent: Their Reasons and Experiences of Social Support.

Kate Coleman-Minahan, Amanda Jean Stevenson, Emily Obront, Susan Hays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characteristics and Circumstances of Adolescents Obtaining Abortions in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Preferences and Experiences Regarding Pregnancy Options Counseling in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kate Coleman-MinahanCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Amanda Jean StevensonDepartment of Sociology, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Emily ObrontAustin, Texas.
Susan HaysAustin, Texas.

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
University of Colorado Population CenterP2CHD066613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI JANE A MENKEN · 2015 to 2026
$3.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD066613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMost states require adolescents younger than 18 to involve a parent prior to obtaining an abortion, yet little is known about adolescents' reasons for choosing abortion or the social support received by those who seek judicial bypass of parental consent for abortion.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 20 individuals aged 16-19 who sought judicial bypass in Texas between 2015 and 2016 to explore why they chose to get an abortion, who they involved in their decision and what their experiences of social support were. Data were analyzed thematically using stigma and social support theories.

resultsParticipants researched their pregnancy options and involved others in their decisions. They chose abortion because parenting would limit their futures, and they believed they could not provide a child with all of her or his needs. Anticipated stigma motivated participants to keep their decision private, although they desired emotional and material support. Not all male partners agreed with adolescents' decisions to seek an abortion, and agreement by some males did not guarantee emotional or material support; some young women described their partners' giving them the "freedom" to make the decision as avoiding responsibility. After a disclosure of their abortion decision, some participants experienced enacted stigma, including shame and emotional abuse.

conclusionsAbortion stigma influences adolescents' disclosure of their abortion decisions and limits their social support. Fears of disclosing their pregnancies and abortion decisions are justified, and policymakers should consider how laws requiring parental notification may harm adolescents. Further research is needed on adolescents' experiences with abortion stigma.

Indexed as

Social StigmaSocial SupportAbortion, InducedAdolescentDecision MakingFemaleHumansParental ConsentParental NotificationPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceTexasYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32115875
PMCPMC7155056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.