Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32115648›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2020

Resection of the irradiated esophagus: the impact of lymph node yield on survival.

V R Esposito, B A Yerokun, M S Mulvihill, M L Cox, B Y Andrew, C J Yang, A Y Choi, C Moore, T A D'Amico, B C Tong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

V R EspositoSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
B A YerokunDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
M S MulvihillDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
M L CoxDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
B Y AndrewSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
C J YangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
A Y ChoiSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
C MooreDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
T A D'AmicoDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
B C TongDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
M G HartwigDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002555 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Cardiothoracic Surgical Network Clinical CenterU01HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2007 to 2013
$2.6M
Duke CTSA (Composite)TL1TR001116 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, KRAFT, MONICA · 2013 to 2017
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001116NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002555NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL088953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is debate surrounding the appropriate threshold for lymph node harvest during esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer, specifically for those receiving preoperative radiation. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of lymph node yield on survival in patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients with esophageal cancer that received preoperative radiation. The cohort was divided into patients undergoing minimal (<9) or extensive (≥9) lymph node yield. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log rank test was used to compare survival between the yield groups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association between lymph node yield and survival. In total, 886 cases were included: 349 (39%) belonging to the minimal node group and 537 (61%) to the extensive group. Unadjusted 5-year survival was similar between the minimal and extensive groups, respectively (37.3% vs. 38.8%; P > 0.05). After adjustment using Cox regression, extensive lymph node yield was associated with survival (hazard ratio 0.80, confidence interval 0.66-0.98, P = 0.03). This study suggests that extensive lymph node yield is advantageous for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy following induction therapy. This most likely reflects improved diagnosis and staging with extensive yield.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionEsophagectomyEsophagusHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rateesophageal canceresophagectomyinduction radiationlymph nodepreoperative radiation

Identifiers

PMID32115648
PMCPMC7548436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.