ArticleCurrent problems in pediatric and adolescent health care2020
Doc, can you test me for "toxic metals"? Challenges of testing for toxicants in patients with environmental concerns.
Article in Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioavailability of and US Infant Exposure to Arsenic, Cadmium, Lead, Mercury, and Per- and Polyfluoroalkyls from Human Milk and Infant Formula: Results from a Series of Systematic Reviews.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Pooled it
- Heavy Metals in Breast Implant Capsules and Breast Tissue: Findings from the Systemic Symptoms in Women-Biospecimen Analysis Study: Part 2.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2022Article
- Environmental contaminants and child development: Developmentally-informed opportunities and recommendations for integrating and informing child environmental health science.New directions for child and adolescent development · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory testing is an important tool to assist clinicians in evaluation of patients with potential environmentally-related illness, however, it can be challenging to select or interpret the appropriate toxicological tests. Recent advances in analytical techniques and expanded consumer access to environmental laboratories led to a rise in laboratory testing for various environmental toxicants, including metals. However, most environmental tests have scant clinical evidence and are not validated for clinical use. While the tests themselves may not present direct harm to the patients, the results of inappropriately selected tests may lead to significant patient stress and unnecessary follow-up or treatment. Given the lack of environmental health content in medical training, pediatricians may feel ill-equipped to address most environmental issues they encounter in practice, including the interpretation of environmental toxicant lab results. This article provides an overview of how to approach a child and family with environmental health concerns about "toxic metals", select appropriate metal tests if indicated, and enlist the assistance of the Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Units (PEHSU) for further management guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.