ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2020
An open-source framework for pulmonary fissure completeness assessment.
Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Precise Pulmonary Airway Tree Segmentation Method Using Quasi-Spherical Region Constraint and Tracheal Wall Gap Sealing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quantifying lung fissure integrity using a three-dimensional patch-based convolutional neural network on CT images for emphysema treatment planning.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Attention U-net for automated pulmonary fissure integrity analysis in lung computed tomography images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an open-source framework for pulmonary fissure completeness assessment. Fissure incompleteness has been shown to associate with emphysema treatment outcomes, motivating the development of tools that facilitate completeness estimation. Generally, the task of fissure completeness assessment requires accurate detection of fissures and definition of the boundary surfaces separating the lung lobes. The framework we describe acknowledges a) the modular nature of fissure detection and lung lobe segmentation (lobe boundary detection), and b) that methods to address these challenges are varied and continually developing. It is designed to be readily deployable on existing lung lobe segmentation and fissure detection data sets. The framework consists of multiple components: a flexible quality control module that enables rapid assessment of lung lobe segmentations, an interactive lobe segmentation tool exposed through 3D Slicer for handling challenging cases, a flexible fissure representation using particles-based sampling that can handle fissure feature-strength or binary fissure detection images, and a module that performs fissure completeness estimation using voxel counting and a novel surface area estimation approach. We demonstrate the usage of the proposed framework by deploying on 100 cases exhibiting various levels of fissure completeness. We compare the two completeness level approaches and also compare to visual reads. The code is available to the community via github as part of the Chest Imaging Platform and a 3D Slicer extension module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.