Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32114833›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2021

Developing and Testing Automatic Models of Patient Communicative Health Literacy Using Linguistic Features: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study.

Scott A Crossley, Renu Balyan, Jennifer Liu, Andrew J Karter, Danielle McNamara, Dean Schillinger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott A CrossleyDepartment of Applied Linguistics, Georgia State University.
Renu BalyanDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University.
Jennifer LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Andrew J KarterDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Danielle McNamaraDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University.
Dean SchillingerSchool of Medicine, University of California.
Arizona State University · USKaiser Permanente · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

WELFARE REFORM AND THE PERINATAL HEALTH OF IMMIGRANTSM01RR000083 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KESSLER, DAVID A · 1985 to 2006
$21.1M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes ComplicationsR01DK065664 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN · 2004 to 2008
$3.3M
The Next Frontier in Diabetes Communication: Promoting Health Literacy in the Era of Secure MessagingR01LM012355 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN, SCHILLINGER, DEAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
Educational Disparities in Diabetes ComplicationsR01HD046113 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN · 2003 to 2006
$1.6M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000083NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046113NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065664NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with diabetes and limited health literacy (HL) may have suboptimal communication exchange with their health care providers and be at elevated risk of adverse health outcomes. These difficulties are generally attributed to patients' reduced ability to both communicate and understand health-related ideas as well as physicians' lack of skill in identifying those with limited HL. Understanding and identifying patients with barriers posed by lower HL to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes is an important research avenue. However, doing so using traditional methods has proven difficult and infeasible to scale. This study using corpus analyses, expert human ratings of HL, and natural language processing (NLP) approaches to estimate HL at the individual patient level. The goal of the study is to better understand HL from a linguistic perspective and to open new research areas to enhance population management and individualized care. Specifically, this study examines HL as a function of patients' demonstrated ability to communicate health-related information to their providers via secure messages. The study develops an NLP-based HL model and validates the model by predicting patient-related events such as medical outcomes and hospitalizations. Results indicate that the developed model predicts human ratings of HL with ~80% accuracy. Validation indicates that lower HL patients are more likely to be nonwhite and have lower educational attainment. In addition, patients with lower HL suffered more negative health outcomes and had higher healthcare service utilization.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansLinguistics

Identifiers

PMID32114833
PMCPMC7483831
OpenAlexW3008035536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.