ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020
The Predictive Value of Return to Work Self-efficacy for Return to Work Among Employees with Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for return to work in workers who experienced cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic factors affecting return to work in cancer patients: a systematic review.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The experiences and perceptions of employers on cancer survivors returning to work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Psychological problems among cancer patients in relation to healthcare and societal costs: A systematic review.Psycho-oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Potential profile analysis of return-to-work readiness and self-efficacy in postoperative breast cancer patients who have returned to work.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multivariable prediction of returning to work among early-onset colorectal cancer survivors in China: A two-year follow-up.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Predictors of return-to-work after thyroid cancer surgery based on random forest model: a cross-sectional study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Recovering or working: women's experiences of working while coping with cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- The Cancer and Work Scale (CAWSE): Assessing Return to Work Likelihood and Employment Sustainability After Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Cancer survivors and adverse work outcomes: associated factors and supportive interventions.British medical bulletin · 2023Review
- Comment to "The Predictive Value of Return-to-Work Self-efficacy for Return to Work Among Employees with Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy".Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
- Usability of self-reported assessment of work functioning in municipal occupational rehabilitation teams: A qualitative study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the present study was to examine the predictive value of Return to Work Self-efficacy (RTWSE) on Return to Work (RTW) among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer and to examine the relative contribution of RTWSE as predictor variable compared to personal, health-related, illness- and treatment-related and work-related factors. Methods A sample of 114 sickness absent employees with various cancers (age 18-62) included in the study on average 33 days after initiating chemotherapy were followed for 15 months. Data sources included patient questionnaires (RTWSE, depression, fatigue, performance status), sociodemographic factors (age, sex, job type, and perceived support from the workplace), patient records (type of cancer, treatment intention, number of treatment modalities, time since diagnosis and time since initiation of chemotherapy), and Danish national registries (RTW and education). Associations between RTWSE at baseline and weeks until full RTW during 15-months follow-up were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results In the univariate analysis, high RTWSE was associated with shorter time to RTW (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.03). In the multivariate model, RTWSE failed to reach statistical significance (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.62-2.02), whereas female sex (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.60) and receiving palliative treatment (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.44) were significantly associated with later RTW. Conclusion Compared to other factors of significance, RTWSE was not the strongest predictor of RTW when examined among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. Before using the RTWSE questionnaire to identify employees with cancer at risk of late RTW, it is important to recognize that the predictive value of RTWSE may be different for employees on sick leave due to cancer than for other sickness absence populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.