Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32114671›Full record

Observational studyInternational urology and nephrology2020

Renal biopsy in very elderly patients (over 80 years): clinical presentation, histological diagnosis, and long-term outcome.

Martin Planchais, Benoit Brilland, Julien Demiselle, Virginie Besson, Agnès Duveau, Anne Croué, Maud Cousin, Jean-François Subra, Jean-François Augusto, Anne-Sophie Garnier

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin PlanchaisCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Benoit BrillandCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Julien DemiselleCHU Angers, Département de Réanimation Médicale et Médecine Hyperbare, Université Angers, Angers, France.
Virginie BessonCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Agnès DuveauCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Anne CrouéCHU Angers, Département de Pathologie cellulaire et tissulaire, Université Angers, Angers, France.
Maud CousinCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Jean-François SubraCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Jean-François AugustoCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Anne-Sophie GarnierCHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France. annesophie.garnier@chu-angers.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3236-3899
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData regarding the long-term outcome of very elderly (VE) patients undergoing renal biopsy (RB) are lacking. The objective of this study was to analyse the outcome of VE patients undergoing RB.

methodsAll patients over 65 years that underwent native RB between 2004 and 2016 in our center were included. Among the 206 included patients, those over 80 years (VE, 46 patients) were analysed and compared to those aged 65-80 years (160 patients). The outcomes of the VE group were analysed.

resultsBaseline characteristics, renal presentation, safety of RB and RB-related diagnosis were not different between VE patients and 65-80-year-old patients. Survival of VE patients was 73.1, 50.6 and 21.8% at 2, 4 and 6 years after RB, significantly poorer than those of 65-80-year-old group. Early death (< 1 year) occurred in 10 VE patients, was associated with a higher proteinuria-to-creatininuria ratio and tended to be associated with a more frequent dialysis need at RB. Of the 46 VE patients, 31 (67.4%) were diagnosed with a potentially reversible kidney disease, of whom 17 (40%) were started on immunosuppressive regimens. Survival of patients with a reversible kidney disease tended to be better than those with other diseases.

conclusionRB appears as a safe and valuable procedure to assess diagnosis of kidney disease in VE patients. Our data suggest that RB is critical for the identification and treatment decision of patients with potentially reversible diseases and may translate in clinical improvement.

Indexed as

BiopsyAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCreatinineFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyKidney DiseasesMaleProteinuriaRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsCreatinineImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney biopsyKidney diseasePrognosisVery elderly

Identifiers

PMID32114671
OpenAlexW3007025586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.