ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020
Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) or GC-like? A picture to be reconsidered in neuro-oncology based on large retrospective analysis of GC series.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting prognostic factors of gliomatosis cerebri in adult-type diffuse gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Surgical treatment of diffuse and multi-lobes involved glioma with the assistance of a multimodal technique.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGliomatosis cerebri (GC), defined until 2016 as a distinct astrocytic glioma entity, has been removed from the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system. However, its identity is still debated. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively present 122 patients, including a subgroup with histology confirmation (n = 75, cohort b).
resultsRadiological features showed extension limited to 3 lobes in 31%; bilateral, midline, and basal ganglia and subtentorial involvement in 95%, 52%, 84%, and 60%, respectively; and contrast enhancement in 59.5%. Perioperative mortality occurred in 4%. Histology concluded for grades II, III, and IV, respectively, in 31%, 35%, and 22% (not specified in 12%). Thirty-one percent had isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutation. Treatments included radiotherapy in 51.2% and chemotherapy in 74.5%. Median overall survival was 17 months. Negative prognostic factors for survival were older age, poorer Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), subtentorial, midline and disseminated disease, and lack of chemotherapy, at univariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, KPS ≥ 80, chemotherapy, and subtentorial and disseminated disease remained prognostic (p < 0.0001). For cohort b, same prognostic factors were confirmed, except for midline location, at univariate analysis; at multivariate analysis, only KPS ≥ 80 and chemotherapy remained prognostic (p < 0.0001).
conclusionWe described clinical, neuroimaging, management, and histomolecular features of one of the largest GC series. We identified KPS ≥ 80, radiological pattern as subtentorial localization and dissemination, and chemotherapy as prognostic factors, at multivariate analysis. Planning prospective study, associated to focused genetic assays, could help to clarify if GC has specific features that may result in the identification as a separate entity from other gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32114667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.