ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020
Knee infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of one thousand, eight hundred and ninety one patients from the single-centre database.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Pooled it
- Prevention and Management of Postoperative Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessing Residual Moisture After Sterilization as an Overlooked Source of Intraoperative Bacterial Contamination in Knee Intra-articular Reconstructions: Evaluating the Reliability of Routine Procedures and Tests.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Infection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Approaches to Septic Arthritis of the Knee Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
- In Vitro Study of Gentamicin Elution from Tendon Grafts.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Experimental and Clinical Efficacy on Surgical Debridement and Systemic Antibiotics Treatment for Early Knee Infection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Septic Arthritis Complicating Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Experience from a Tertiary-Care Hospital.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Management Guidelines for Infection After ACL Reconstruction: Expert Opinion Statement Based on the Modified Delphi Survey of Indian Arthroscopy Surgeons.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study was undertaken to retrospectively determine the incidence of postoperative knee infection following ACL reconstruction, to identify the most common causative pathogen and to evaluate our diagnostic and treatment approach, as well as to review current recommendations for the management of septic arthritis.
methodsFrom January 2007 to December 2017, a total of 1891 arthroscopic ACL reconstructions were performed at our institution. Twenty-nine cases with clinical suspicion of post-operative septic knee arthritis following ACL reconstruction were identified and retrospectively analysed with regard to incidence, clinical presentation, microbiological spectrum, laboratory parameters and number of arthroscopic debridements. Three patients were classified as aseptic effusion and were excluded from the further analysis. Patients were treated with antibiotic therapy (IV and oral) and repeated arthroscopic debridement.
resultsTwenty-six (1.4%) out of 1891 patients were diagnosed with joint infection and were treated with arthroscopic debridement and intravenous antibiotics. In the majority of cases (58.69%), microbiological analysis failed to identify the causative pathogen and in those where the pathogen was isolated, the most common was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (45.45%). Mean time interval from reconstruction to onset of symptoms was 23.54 ± 21.00 (6-100) days. The mean number of arthroscopic irrigations and debridements was 1.23 ± 0.51 (1-3) per patient. In all, twenty-six cases of graft was retained.
conclusionSeptic arthritis following ACL reconstruction is a rare but serious complication. We conclude that prompt treatment consisting of repeated arthroscopic irrigation and debridement with course of antibiotic therapy is an effective therapeutic intervention that leads to graft and hardware retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.