Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32114468›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Care of the patient with invasive meningococcal disease by prehospital emergency medical service clinicians: a scoping review.

James Pearce, Micah Peters, Nikki May, Helen Marshall, Cindy Hein, Hugh Grantham

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

James PearceCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia james.pearce@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9580-2943
Micah PetersRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Nikki MaySA Health Library Service, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Helen MarshallSchool of Medicine and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-5166
Cindy HeinCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Hugh GranthamSouth Australian Ambulance Service, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AUCurtin University · AUSA Health · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the literature to identify the scope, depth, key concepts and gaps in the evidence regarding care of the patient with invasive meningococcal disease by emergency medical service (EMS) clinicians.

designScoping review. This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guideline. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Sources which focused on patients with invasive meningococcal disease (population), where the care of EMS clinicians was the focus (concept), in EMS systems worldwide (context) were eligible for inclusion. SEARCH STRATEGY: This review utilised a comprehensive search strategy including MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and 'grey' literature databases from 1992 to January 2019. The search also included a Google search, a hand-search of relevant journals, screening of reference lists, contact with authors of included sources and use of social media in an attempt to locate all sources of evidence which fit the inclusion criteria of the review. Two reviewers independently screened sources for inclusion.

resultsThe search yielded 1803 unique records, of which 10 were included in the synthesis. No original research papers were identified, with all sources classed as either clinical audit or text and opinion literature. The dominant concept throughout the literature is that early antibiotic therapy is critical in the treatment of invasive meningococcal disease.

conclusionsOverall, there is a very narrow scope and shallow depth of literature on the topic of interest. There are gaps in the evidence regarding the care of the patient with invasive meningococcal disease by EMS clinicians. Despite these shortfalls, current consensus-based guidelines should direct clinical practice. Further research is planned to bridge the gaps in knowledge to support best practice.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesMeningococcal InfectionsHumansambulanceemergency medical servicesmeningococcal diseasescoping reviewsepsis

Identifiers

PMID32114468
PMCPMC7050377
OpenAlexW3006834918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.