Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32114149›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Exploring brain-behavior relationships in the N-back task.

Bidhan Lamichhane, Andrew Westbrook, Michael W Cole, Todd S Braver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Executive Dysfunction and Depression Risk in Adolescence: Functional-MRI Analysis of Transient Network States During a Working Memory Task.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Orthogonal-Rotational Dynamics Supports Efficient Encoding and Updating for Streaming Information in Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Differential Transfer Effects Across Tasks in Younger and Older Adults Following Executive Function Training.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Disentangling metabolic and neurovascular timescales supporting cognitive processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Neurobiology of Cognitive Fatigue and Its Influence on Effort-Based Choice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bidhan LamichhaneDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. Electronic address: bidhanlamichhane@wustl.edu.
Andrew WestbrookDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive, Linguistics, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, 190 Thayer Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Michael W ColeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

Funding

Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive ControlR37MH066078 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
Brain Network Mechanisms of Aging-Related Cognitive DeclineR01AG055556 · NIA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2017 to 2022
$2.3M
Brain Network Mechanisms of Instructed LearningR01MH109520 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NEUROECONOMICS OF AGING AND COGNITIVE CONTROL: A DISCOUNTING FRAMEWORKR01AG043461 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2014 to 2016
$752k
Interactions of Motivation and Cognitive Control in Older Adult Decision-MakingR21AG058206 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2017 to 2018
$419k
NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS ON NEURAL MECHANISMS OF COGNITIVE CONTROLR21DA027821 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2009 to 2010
$416k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043461NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055556NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058206NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027821NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109520NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH066078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) function has traditionally been investigated in terms of two dimensions: within-individual effects of WM load, and between-individual differences in task performance. In human neuroimaging studies, the N-back task has frequently been used to study both. A reliable finding is that activation in frontoparietal regions exhibits an inverted-U pattern, such that activity tends to decrease at high load levels. Yet it is not known whether such U-shaped patterns are a key individual differences factor that can predict load-related changes in task performance. The current study investigated this question by manipulating load levels across a much wider range than explored previously (N ​= ​1-6), and providing a more comprehensive examination of brain-behavior relationships. In a sample of healthy young adults (n ​= ​57), the analysis focused on a distinct region of left lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) identified in prior work to show a unique relationship with task performance and WM function. In this region it was the linear slope of load-related activity, rather than the U-shaped pattern, that was positively associated with individual differences in target accuracy. Comprehensive supplemental analyses revealed the brain-wide selectivity of this pattern. Target accuracy was also independently predicted by the global resting-state connectivity of this LPFC region. These effects were robust, as demonstrated by cross-validation analyses and out-of-sample prediction, and also critically, were primarily driven by the high-load conditions. Together, the results highlight the utility of high-load conditions for investigating individual differences in WM function.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdultBrainExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermNeural PathwaysYoung AdultDefault mode networkDorsolateral prefrontal cortexFrontal-parietal networkN-backSalience networkWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32114149
PMCPMC7781187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.