Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32113999›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2021

Small-molecule drug repurposing to target DNA damage repair and response pathways.

Jacqueline A Brinkman, Yue Liu, Stephen J Kron

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacqueline A BrinkmanDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Yue LiuDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Stephen J KronDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: skron@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Image-guided radiation-induced permeability (IGRIP) for IGDDR01CA199663 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KRON, STEPHEN J., WEICHSELBAUM, RALPH R · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Targets of Reactive Lipid Species regulating DNA damage response and cell senescenceR01CA217182 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KRON, STEPHEN J. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199663NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades genotoxic therapy has been a mainstay in the treatment of cancer, based on the understanding that the deregulated growth and genomic instability that drive malignancy also confer a shared vulnerability. Although chemotherapy and radiation can be curative, only a fraction of patients benefit, while nearly all are subjected to the harmful side-effects. Drug repurposing, defined here as retooling existing drugs and compounds as chemo or radiosensitizers, offers an attractive route to identifying otherwise non-toxic agents that can potentiate the benefits of genotoxic cancer therapy to enhance the therapeutic ratio. This review seeks to highlight recent progress in defining cellular mechanisms of the DNA damage response including damage sensing, chromatin modification, DNA repair, checkpoint signaling, and downstream survival and death pathways, as a framework to determine which drugs and natural products may offer the most potential for repurposing as chemo- and/or radiosensitizers. We point to classical examples and recent progress that have identified drugs that disrupt cellular responses to DNA damage and may offer the greatest clinical potential. The most important next steps may be to initiate prospective clinical trials toward translating these laboratory discoveries to benefit patients.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesDrug RepositioningHumansNeoplasmsSmall Molecule LibrariesAntineoplastic AgentsDNA Repair EnzymesSmall Molecule LibrariesApoptosisHomologous recombinationNHEJSenescence

Identifiers

PMID32113999
PMCPMC7483256
OpenAlexW3008579162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.