Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32113583›Full record

ArticleVeterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2020

Evaluation of novel multiplex qPCR assays for diagnosis of pathogens associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex.

P Pansri, J Katholm, K M Krogh, A K Aagaard, L M B Schmidt, E Kudirkiene, L E Larsen, J E Olsen

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Establishment and epidemiological investigation of a dual fluorescent qPCR assay forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Development and validation of an insulated isothermal PCR assay for the rapid detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

P PansriDNA Diagnostic, Risskov, Denmark.
J KatholmDNA Diagnostic, Risskov, Denmark.
K M KroghLVK Veterinary Cattle Practice, Hobro, Denmark.
A K AagaardDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Denmark.
L M B SchmidtDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Denmark.
E KudirkieneDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Denmark.
L E LarsenNational Veterinary Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
J E OlsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Denmark. Electronic address: jeo@sund.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKDNA Diagnostic (Denmark) · DKDanish Cattle Research Centre · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease complex is the most common disease requiring the use of antimicrobials in industrial calf production worldwide. Pathogenic bacteria (Mannheimia haemolytica (Mh), Pasteurella multocida (Pm), Histophilus somni (Hs), and Mycoplasma bovis) and a range of viruses (bovine respiratory syncytial virus, bovine coronavirus, bovine parainfluenza virus type 3, bovine viral diarrhea virus and bovine herpesvirus type 1) are associated with this complex. As most of these pathogens can be present in healthy and diseased calves, simple detection of their presence in diseased calves carries low predictive value. In other multi-agent diseases of livestock, quantification of pathogens has added substantially to the predictive value of microbiological diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of two recently developed quantitative PCR (qPCR) kits (Pneumo4B and Pneumo4V) to detect and quantify these bacterial and viral pathogens, respectively. Test efficiencies of the qPCR assays, based on nucleic acid dilution series of target bacteria and viruses, were 93-106% and 91-104%, respectively, with assay detection limits of 10-50 copies of nucleic acids. All 44 strains of target bacteria were correctly identified, with no false positive reactions in 135strains of non-target bacterial species. Based on standard curves of log

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattleMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityVirusesBovine respiratory diseaseCalf pneumoniaMultiplex qPCR

Identifiers

PMID32113583
PMCPMC7110767
OpenAlexW3000691667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.