Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32112478›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2020

Radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations - perspectives and challenges.

Michele Mondini, Antonin Levy, Lydia Meziani, Fabien Milliat, Eric Deutsch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michele MondiniGustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5803-0083
Antonin LevyINSERM, U1030, Labex LERMIT, Villejuif, France.
Lydia MezianiGustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France.
Fabien MilliatDepartment of Radiobiology and regenerative Medicine (SERAMED), Laboratory of Medical Radiobiology (LRMed), Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Eric DeutschGustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheFondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le CancerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleInstitut National Du Cancer 2014-1-PL BIO-03Institut National Du Cancer INCa 2018-1-PL BIO-06-1SIRIC SOCRATE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation has historically been used to treat cancer by killing tumour cells, in particular by inducing DNA damage. This view of radiotherapy (RT) as a simple cytotoxic agent has dramatically changed in recent years, and it is now widely accepted that RT can deeply reshape the tumour environment by modulating the immune response. Such evidence gives a strong rationale for the use of immunomodulators to boost the therapeutic value of RT, introducing the era of 'immunoradiotherapy'. The increasing amount of preclinical and clinical data concerning the combination of RT with immunomodulators, in particular with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4, reflects the interest of the scientific and medical community concerning immunoradiotherapy. The expectations are enormous since the rationale for performing such combinations is strong, with the possibility to use a local treatment such as RT to amplify a systemic antitumour response, as illustrated by the case of the abscopal effect. Nevertheless, several points remain to be addressed such as the need to find biomarkers to identify patients who will benefit from immunoradiotherapy, the identification of the best sequences/schedules for combination with immunomodulators and mechanisms to overcome resistance. Additionally, the effects of immunoradiotherapy on healthy tissues and related toxicity remain largely unexplored. To answer these critical questions and make immunoradiotherapy keep its promising qualities, large efforts are needed from both the pharmaceutical industry and academic/governmental research. Moreover, because of the work of both these entities, the arsenal of available immunomodulators is quickly expanding, thus opening the field to increasing combinations with RT. We thus forecast that the field of immunoradiotherapy will further expand in the coming years, and it needs to be supported by appropriate investment plans.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyRadiotherapyClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppression TherapyOrgan SpecificityImmunologic Factorsabscopal effectimmune modulationimmunotherapyradiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32112478
PMCPMC7332212
OpenAlexW3008362893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.