Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32112354›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

A quantitative comparison of arm activity between survivors of breast cancer and healthy controls: use of accelerometry.

Mary Insana Fisher, Claire C Davies, Timothy L Uhl

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Is it really over when it is over? physical, mental and emotional health status of long-term breast cancer survivors compared to healthy matched controls.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Insana FisherDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA. mary.fisher@udayton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0531-591X
Claire C DaviesNursing and Allied Health Research Office, Baptist Health Lexington, Lexington, KY, USA.
Timothy L UhlDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Central Baptist Hospital · USUniversity of Dayton · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

American Physical Therapy Association --
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurvivors of breast cancer (BC) on the non-dominant side have more persistent deficits than those with cancer on the dominant limb. What is not known is whether those with BC use their involved upper limbs more, less, or at the same level as women without BC. Accelerometer use offers a quantifiable method to measure activity levels of upper limbs. The purpose of this study was to quantify the activity levels of the non-dominant involved limb among survivors of BC and compare these values to their dominant limb, as well as the non-dominant limb of a control group.

methodsParticipants (n = 30) were women with unilateral BC on the non-dominant limb, diagnosed between 6 and 24 months prior to data collection, and a matched healthy group of women as controls. Participants completed the following questionnaires: medical and demographics, Brief Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory - Short form, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Beck Depression Index. Participants wore an accelerometer on each wrist during waking hours for 7 days. Arm activity was measured using vector magnitude activity counts extracted from the accelerometers.

resultsThere were no significant differences in total vector magnitude activity counts between groups for either limb. Within group dominant to non-dominant comparison was significantly different (p ≤ 0.001). No significant difference in pain was present but significant differences for fatigue (p = 0.002), depression (p = 0.004), and DASH scores (p = 0.035) were present.

conclusionsWomen with non-dominant BC use their involved limb similar to healthy controls but less than their dominant limb.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAccelerometryAdultAgedArmCase-Control StudiesExerciseFatigueFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMovementQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularShoulderBreast neoplasmPhysical functionQuality of lifeUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID32112354
OpenAlexW3006864897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.