Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32112258›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology2020

Neurocognition after prenatal levetiracetam, lamotrigine, carbamazepine or valproate exposure.

Yfke Huber-Mollema, Loretta van Iterson, Frans J Oort, Dick Lindhout, Roos Rodenburg

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Is Valproate Reasonable?The American journal of psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yfke Huber-MollemaStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-1929
Loretta van ItersonStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Frans J OortResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 15776, 1001 NG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick LindhoutStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-624X
Roos RodenburgStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands. H.R.Rodenburg@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-1737
Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Stichting panta rhei -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine neurocognitive functioning of children exposed prenatally to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam or valproate monotherapy.

methodsIn a prospective observational study, children aged 6 or 7 years, identified from the European Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy database in The Netherlands, were assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children and the developmental neuropsychological assessment. Maternal IQ was measured using Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Assessors were blinded to drug exposures.

resultsOne hundred and sixty-one children (one set of twins and 21 sibling pairs) of 139 mothers were included. As a group, children achieved average scores on neurocognitive outcomes. Children exposed to valproate (n = 22) performed lower on all six neurocognitive domains, especially language, than those exposed to carbamazepine (n = 32), lamotrigine (n = 82) or levetiracetam (n = 25). After controlling for maternal IQ and drug dose, the verbal IQ of valproate-exposed children was on average 9.1 points lower than those exposed to carbamazepine (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-17.0; p = 0.023), 10.3 lower than lamotrigine-exposed children (CI 3.4-17.3; p = 0.004) and 13.4 lower than levetiracetam-exposed children (CI 5.2-21.6; p = 0.002). No significant dose-effect was found. Virtually no significant differences were found between lamotrigine and levetiracetam or lamotrigine and carbamazepine exposed children.

conclusionsConsistent with previous research, valproate-exposed children experienced more problems compared to three other common antiepileptic drugs, while children exposed to lamotrigine, carbamazepine or levetiracetam revealed little to no problems. This illustrates the need for systematic follow-up of prenatally exposed children, to support pre-pregnancy counseling and treatment decisions in women of reproductive age.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineChildChild DevelopmentCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansLamotrigineLevetiracetamNetherlandsNeuropsychological TestsPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsProspective StudiesRegistriesValproic AcidAnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineLamotrigineLevetiracetamValproic AcidAntiepileptic drugsCognitionEpilepsyEURAP & developmentNeuropsychological assessmentPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32112258
PMCPMC7293688
OpenAlexW3008770244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.