ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020
[Clinical experience with the Clareon® IOL and the AutonoMe® implantation system].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twelve-Months Follow-Up Postmarket Study of a Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens Using a Preloaded Automated Injector in an Indian Population.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Trial
- Early intraocular lens explantations: 10-year database analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Clinical Evaluation of a Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens Using a Preloaded Automated Injector in a Korean Population.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Comparative evaluation of an automated preloaded delivery system with a non-preloaded system.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe AutonoMe® implantation system with a preloaded, monofocal, aspherical, hydrophobic Clareon® intraocular lens (IOL) has recently become available. The aim of this analysis was the most comprehensive review of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes to date.
methodsProspective evaluation of intraoperative features in all eyes scheduled to have cataract surgery with Clareon® IOL implantation using the AutonoMe® implantation system between December 2017 and September 2018 with follow-up at 4-6 weeks. Inclusion of all patients, regardless of comorbidities and accompanying ocular surgery.
resultsA total of 391 eyes were evaluated for the intraoperative analysis and 144 eyes were evaluated for postoperative follow-up. There was one IOL-associated intraoperative complication in which the posterior haptic was not correctly loaded and should not have been implanted. The best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) increased from a mean of 0.33 logMAR (SD 0.21) preoperatively to 0.09 logMAR (SD 0.21) postoperatively, independent of ocular comorbidities. The BCDVA in patients without ocular comorbidities increased from 0.27 logMAR (SD 0.13) preoperatively to 0.03 logMAR (SD 0.05) postoperatively. Using the SRK®/T formula 87.5% of all eyes had a refractive error of ≤0.5 D and 98.0% had a refractive error of ≤1 D 4-6 weeks after surgery.
conclusionThis study showed that using the recommended safety guidelines, the AutonoMe® system enables safe implantation of the IOL. The Clareon® IOL showed good postoperative visual outcomes and refraction results using the SRK®/T formula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.