Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32112166›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2020

A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Grzegorz Niewiński, Wojciech Figiel, Michał Grąt, Marta Dec, Marcin Morawski, Waldemar Patkowski, Krzysztof Zieniewicz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03620916 (Comparison of the Efficacy of Postoperative Analgesia by a Single Dose of Intrathecal Morphine and Intravenous Morphine), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03620916 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of the Efficacy of Postoperative Analgesia by a Single Dose of Intrathecal Morphine and Intravenous Morphine: a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2018 to 2019Enrolled36ConditionsLiver Diseases, Liver Cancer, Liver MetastasesArmsIntravenous morphine, Intrathecal morphine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grzegorz NiewińskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech FigielDepartment of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland. w.figiel@yahoo.es.
Michał GrątDepartment of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta DecDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin MorawskiDepartment of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Waldemar PatkowskiDepartment of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof ZieniewiczDepartment of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective analgesia is essential for patient recovery after liver resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the addition of preoperative intrathecal morphine to multimodal intravenous analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection.

methodsIn this single-blind randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing liver resection were randomly assigned to the patient-controlled analgesia with (ITM-IV) or without (IV) preoperative intrathecal morphine groups. All patients received acetaminophen and dexketoprofen. The primary outcome was pain severity at rest over three postoperative days, assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS).

resultsThe study included 36 patients (18 in each group). The mean maximum daily NRS scores over the first three postoperative days in the ITM-IV and IV groups were 1.3, 1.1, and 0.3 and 1.6, 1.1, and 0.7, respectively (p = 0.580). No differences were observed in pain severity while coughing, with corresponding scores of 2.8, 2.1, and 1.1, respectively, in the ITM-IV group and 2.3, 2.2, and 1.5, respectively, in the IV group (p = 0.963). Proportions of patients reporting clinically significant pain at rest and while coughing were 11.1% and 44.4%, respectively, in the ITM-IV group, and 16.7% and 44.4%, respectively, in the IV group (both p > 0.999). Cumulative morphine doses in the ITM-IV and IV groups were 26 mg and 17 mg, respectively (p = 0.257). Both groups also showed similar time to mobilization (p = 0.791) and solid food intake (p = 0.743), sedation grade (p = 0.584), and morbidity (p = 0.402).

conclusionsPreoperative intrathecal morphine administration provides no benefits to multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: NCT03620916.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, SpinalMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID32112166
PMCPMC7266793
OpenAlexW3008229165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.