Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32112155›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Lower leg, ankle and foot].

G Bratke, S Haneder, K Wegmann, A-I Iuga

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G BratkeInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
S HanederInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. Stefan.Haneder@uk-koeln.de.
K WegmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
A-I IugaInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
University Hospital Cologne · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueBipedal locomotion means high mechanical stress on the lower extremities and susceptibility to fractures. On the one hand, these can be the result of a one-time traumatic stress in the context of high speed traumas or falls, but can also result from repetitive microtraumas with subsequent stress fractures. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsFor all fracture entities and localizations, X‑ray diagnostics is the basic modality. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: For optimal surgical reconstruction of intra-articular fractures or in complex fracture configurations, computed tomography should be generously used to improve postoperative outcome. PERFORMANCE: The classification of the individual fractures should enable standardised further therapy planning, especially with regard to conventional or surgical treatment. ACHIEVEMENTS: The combination of X‑ray, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography makes a reliable diagnosis regarding foot fractures possible. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Important for the use of individual classification systems is always, in addition to clinical relevance, the safe and equal understanding of the individual types and degrees by the radiologist and the referring colleague.

Indexed as

AnkleAnkle InjuriesIntra-Articular FracturesAnkle JointFootHumansRadiographyClassificationComputed tomographyFracturesReconstructionTrauma

Identifiers

PMID32112155
OpenAlexW3008610066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.