Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32112020›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2020

Investigating the prevalence of non-fluoride toothpaste use in adults and children using nationally representative data from New Zealand: a cross-sectional study.

Matthew Hobbs, Lukas Marek, Riana Clarke, John McCarthy, Melanie Tomintz, Alicia Wade, Malcolm Campbell, Simon Kingham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pacific oral health: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Oral health of children in Aotearoa New Zealand-time for change.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2022
    Review
  10. Cariogenic Risk and COVID-19 Lockdown in a Paediatric Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew HobbsGeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. matt.hobbs@canterbury.ac.nz.
Lukas MarekGeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Riana ClarkeMinistry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
John McCarthyMinistry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Melanie TomintzGeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Alicia Wade, Registered Dentist, New Zealand.
Malcolm CampbellGeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Simon KinghamGeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZMinistry of Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Despite improvements in oral health outcomes in New Zealand over the last number of decades, there are still high levels of preventable tooth decay in adults and children. We investigate the prevalence and spatial variation of non-fluoride toothpaste use in a nationally representative sample of adults and children in New Zealand.Method Individual-level self-reported data were sourced from the New Zealand Health Survey (2017/18). Both child (n = 4,723) and adult (n = 13,869) data were used. Data included sociodemographic (for example, age), socioeconomic (for example, area-level deprivation) and dental-related (for example, type of toothpaste used) variables.Results Overall, 6.8% of adults and 6.4% of children use non-fluoride toothpaste. When split by deprivation, the highest prevalence of non-fluoride toothpaste use for children and adults was in the moderate to least deprived areas, while the lowest prevalence was in the most deprived areas. When disaggregated by ethnicity, the Asian population had the highest prevalence of non-fluoride toothpaste use for both adults and children compared to Māori, Pacific and European/Other. There was little difference in prevalence by rural/urban classification; however, prevalence varied geographically across the study area.Conclusion This is the first study that uses a nationally representative sample of adults and children to show variation in the use of non-fluoride toothpaste in New Zealand.

Indexed as

Cariostatic AgentsToothpastesAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFluoridesHumansNew ZealandPrevalenceCariostatic AgentsFluoridesToothpastes

Identifiers

PMID32112020
OpenAlexW3008361427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.