Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32111961›Full record

SynthesisCommunications biology2020

Effect direction meta-analysis of GWAS identifies extreme, prevalent and shared pleiotropy in a large mammal.

Ruidong Xiang, Irene van den Berg, Iona M MacLeod, Hans D Daetwyler, Michael E Goddard

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Genome-wide association study of mature cow size traits in American Angus cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating extensive functional annotations and multiomics of cattle enhances climate resilience prediction and mapping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pleiotropic Bias and Study Design Considerations in Genetic Association Studies.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruidong XiangFaculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia. ruidong.xiang@unimelb.edu.au.
Irene van den BergFaculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia.
Iona M MacLeodAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.
Hans D DaetwylerAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.
Michael E GoddardFaculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia.
Agriculture Victoria · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In genome-wide association studies (GWAS), variants showing consistent effect directions across populations are considered as true discoveries. We model this information in an Effect Direction MEta-analysis (EDME) to quantify pleiotropy using GWAS of 34 Cholesky-decorrelated traits in 44,000+ cattle with sequence variants. The effect-direction agreement between independent bull and cow datasets was used to quantify the false discovery rate by effect direction (FDRed) and the number of affected traits for prioritised variants. Variants with multi-trait p < 1e-6 affected 1∼22 traits with an average of 10 traits. EDME assigns pleiotropic variants to each trait which informs the biology behind complex traits. New pleiotropic loci are identified, including signals from the cattle FTO locus mirroring its bystander effects on human obesity. When validated in the 1000-Bull Genome database, the prioritized pleiotropic variants consistently predicted expected phenotypic differences between dairy and beef cattle. EDME provides robust approaches to control GWAS FDR and quantify pleiotropy.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyGenome-Wide Association StudyAdiposityAlpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTOAnimalsBystander EffectCattleFemaleGene FrequencyMaleMammalsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAlpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTO

Identifiers

PMID32111961
PMCPMC7048789
OpenAlexW3009844087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.