ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava - Accidental Finding.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mediastinal Lymphangioma of the Adult: Case Report and Literature Review.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Venous Port implantation in persistent left superior vena cava with azygos vein variation: a case report and literature review.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- A 4-month-old male with Raghib syndrome: a rare case report from Syria.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Accidental Detection of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava During Central Venous Port Placement.Cureus · 2023Article
- Article
- Spontaneous Pulmonary Hematoma: Case Report of a Giant Post-COVID-19 Hematoma and Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Case report of double superior vena cava and double odd vein with hypoplastic left brachiocephalic vein.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Unusual Cause of Stroke in a Middle-Aged Woman.Kansas journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Revealed by an Associated Asthma.Case reports in vascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe presence of the superior left vena cava represents a rare anomaly of the thoracic venous system. CASE REPORT: An asymptomatic case of this type of anomaly, discovered as an accident during investigations for a different pathology (superior left pulmonary lobe tumor), is presented. A 56-year-old, heavy smoker was admitted in our clinic with a tumoral mass in the left superior pulmonary lobe discovered during a routine chest x-ray. Physical and clinical examination was normal. However, transthoracic echography noted a coronary sinus enlargement, which led to the suspicion of a thoracic venous anomaly. Contrast chest computed tomography pointed out a venous anomaly at the level of the left hemithorax originating from the cervical region, crossing the aortic arch and draining in the coronary sinus. During the examination, contrast substance was not detected in the right superior vena cava, either early or late during the computed tomography. During surgery the presence of a persistent left superior vena cava was observed, coming from the cervical region, crossing lateral to the aortic arch and draining in the coronary sinus.
conclusionThe presence of an enlarged coronary sinus should warn the surgeon about the possibility of a thoracic venous anomaly. Identifying a persistent left superior vena cava is important due to its clinical implications, especially during certain procedures such as mounting central venous lines, cardiac cannulation or implantation of cardiac stimulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.