Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32111222›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020

Herbal medicine from the perspective of type II diabetic patients and physicians: what is the relationship?

Aljawharah Alqathama, Ghadeer Alluhiabi, Halah Baghdadi, Lujain Aljahani, Ola Khan, Sara Jabal, Shorooq Makkawi, Farah Alhomoud

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Effects ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antidiabetic Activity of Hydromethanolic Extract of CrudeJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aljawharah AlqathamaDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia. aaqathama@uqu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0855-2013
Ghadeer AlluhiabiDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Halah BaghdadiDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Lujain AljahaniDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Ola KhanDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Sara JabalDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Shorooq MakkawiDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacy College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Farah AlhomoudDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a major public health problem and one of the most challenging diseases worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has the second highest rate of diabetes in the Middle East and seventh highest globally. Some diabetic patients may prefer to use alternative approaches such as herbal remedies to control their blood glucose level and this study aims to assess the prevalence of herbal usage and to evaluate users' and doctors' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about herbal medicine as well as the patient/doctor relationship in this regard.

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted in several hospitals and medical centres in Makkah, KSA, between January and March 2019. Around 289 type II diabetic patients and 105 doctors were interviewed.

resultsWe found that 68% of the participants were frequent consumers of herbal remedies, especially cinnamon, ginger and fenugreek. Patients' knowledge of herbal usage was mainly gleaned from family and friends as well as social media, and we found that many (71.4%) did not bother to consult or inform their doctors about their choice to self-medicate with herbs. Patients had no concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of herbal usage use in diabetes, as around half of the participants believe that herbal medicine is effective (54%) and safe (46%) for treating symptoms of diabetes. Two-thirds of the doctors (66%) routinely ask patients whether they use herbs for their condition. Although 25% of the doctors took a positive view of herbal medicine in relation to diabetes, others expressed concerns with the rise in herb use and want to see more attention paid to safety aspects.

conclusionThe study concludes that herbal remedies are commonly used by diabetic patients and that a gap exists in the relationship between patients and doctors concerning the disclosure of herbal remedy use and views on its safety.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHerbal MedicineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhytotherapyPrevalenceSaudi ArabiaAttitudeBeliefDiabetesHerbal medicineHerbsKnowledgePatientsPhysicianPrevalenceRelationship

Identifiers

PMID32111222
PMCPMC7076897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.