Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32111201›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2020

A snapshot of microbial diversity and function in an undisturbed sugarcane bagasse pile.

Leigh Gebbie, Tuan Tu Dam, Rebecca Ainscough, Robin Palfreyman, Li Cao, Mark Harrison, Ian O'Hara, Robert Speight

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leigh GebbieQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Tuan Tu DamQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Rebecca AinscoughQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Robin PalfreymanMetabolomics Australia, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Li CaoQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Mark HarrisonQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Ian O'HaraQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Robert SpeightQueensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia. robert.speight@qut.edu.au.
Queensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugarcane bagasse is a major source of lignocellulosic biomass, yet its economic potential is not fully realised. To add value to bagasse, processing is needed to gain access to the embodied recalcitrant biomaterials. When bagasse is stored in piles in the open for long periods it is colonised by microbes originating from the sugarcane, the soil nearby or spores in the environment. For these microorganisms to proliferate they must digest the bagasse to access carbon for growth. The microbial community in bagasse piles is thus a potential resource for the discovery of useful and novel microbes and industrial enzymes. We used culturing and metabarcoding to understand the diversity of microorganisms found in a uniquely undisturbed bagasse storage pile and screened the cultured organisms for fibre-degrading enzymes.

resultsSamples collected from 60 to 80 cm deep in the bagasse pile showed hemicellulose and partial lignin degradation. One hundred and four microbes were cultured from different layers and included a high proportion of oleaginous yeast and biomass-degrading fungi. Overall, 70, 67, 70 and 57% of the microbes showed carboxy-methyl cellulase, xylanase, laccase and peroxidase activity, respectively. These percentages were higher in microbes selectively cultured from deep layers, with all four activities found for 44% of these organisms. Culturing and amplicon sequencing showed that there was less diversity and therefore more selection in the deeper layers, which were dominated by thermophiles and acid tolerant organisms, compared with the top of pile. Amplicon sequencing indicated that novel fungi were present in the pile.

conclusionsA combination of culture-dependent and independent methods was successful in exploring the diversity in the bagasse pile. The variety of species that was found and that are known for biomass degradation shows that the bagasse pile was a valuable selective environment for the identification of new microbes and enzymes with biotechnological potential. In particular, lignin-modifying activities have not been reported previously for many of the species that were identified, suggesting future studies are warranted.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsBiomassCarbonCelluloseFungal ProteinsFungiHydrolysisMicrobiological TechniquesPhylogenySaccharumSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyBacterial ProteinsbagasseCarbonCelluloseFungal ProteinsAmplicon sequencingBagasseBiomassCellulaseFungiLaccaseLignocellulosePeroxidaseSugarcaneXylanase

Identifiers

PMID32111201
PMCPMC7049217
OpenAlexW3010442731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.