Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110970›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Ryan Kean, Jason Brown, Dolunay Gulmez, Alicia Ware, Gordon Ramage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. EmergentMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low-level direct currents eradicate multi-drug-resistantChemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multidrug-ResistantThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025
    Review
  9. Investigation on possible resistance ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sensitivity Analysis ofPathogens & immunity · 2024
    Article
  15. The Gordian Knot ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Antifungal therapy ofBiofilm · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan KeanDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Jason BrownSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK.
Dolunay GulmezSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK.
Alicia WareDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Gordon RamageSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

biofilmsCandida aurisin vivo modelspathogenicity

Identifiers

PMID32110970
PMCPMC7150997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.