Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110845›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2020

Azo dying of α-keratin material improves microbial keratinase screening and standardization.

Milena Gonzalo, Roall Espersen, Waleed A Al-Soud, Francesco Cristiano Falco, Per Hägglund, Søren J Sørensen, Birte Svensson, Samuel Jacquiod

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Milena GonzaloSection of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Roall EspersenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Waleed A Al-SoudSection of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Francesco Cristiano FalcoDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Per HägglundDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Søren J SørensenSection of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birte SvenssonDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Samuel JacquiodSection of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-7996
University of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial conversion through enzymatic reactions has received a lot of attention as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way to recover amino acids and short peptides from keratin materials. However, accurate assessment of microbial keratinase activity is not straightforward, and current available methods lack sensitivity and standardization. Here, we suggest an optimized Azokeratin assay, with substrate generated directly from azo-dyed raw keratin material. We introduced supernatant filtration in the protocol for optimal stopping of keratinase reactions instead of the widely used trichloroacetic acid (TCA), as it generated biases and impacted the sensitivity. We furthermore suggest a method for standardization of keratinase activity signals using proteinase K, a well-known keratinase, as a reference enabling reproducibility between studies. Lastly, we evaluated our developed method with several bacterial isolates through benchmarking against a commercial assay (Keratin Azure). Under different setups, the Azokeratin method was more sensitive than commonly used Keratin Azure-based assays (3-fold). We argue that this method could be applied with any type of keratin substrate, enabling more robust and sensitive results which can be used for further comparison with other studies, thus representing an important progress within the field of microbial keratin degradation.

Indexed as

KeratinsPeptide HydrolasesReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultskeratinaseKeratinsPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID32110845
PMCPMC7264887
OpenAlexW3007559890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.