Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110764›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2020

Pharmacokinetic-tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes.

Stacy E Croteau, Allison P Wheeler, Osman Khan, Kristina M Haley, Alexandra J Borst, Susan Lattimore, Cindy H T Yeung, Alfonso Iorio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacy E CroteauBoston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6112-6166
Allison P WheelerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee.
Osman KhanUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma.
Kristina M HaleyThe Hemophilia Center at Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon.
Alexandra J BorstMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt Nashville Tennessee.
Susan LattimoreThe Hemophilia Center at Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon.
Cindy H T YeungDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.
Alfonso IorioDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-8766
Impact · CAOregon Health & Science University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical application of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) is of increasing interest to patients with hemophilia, providers, and payers. Routine use of popPK profiles in factor replacement prophylaxis decision making has the potential to maintain or improve efficacy and reduce product consumption.

aimTo investigate the feasibility of implementation and longitudinal assessment of pharmacokinetic (PK)-tailored prophylaxis in routine clinical practice for hemophilia A and to describe factors that influence decision making for prescribed hemophilia prophylaxis.

methodsThis longitudinal, multicenter, prospective feasibility study of children and adults with hemophilia A without inhibitors used the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia (WAPPS-Hemo) to generate PK profiles. Assessments over 12 weeks captured data on prescribed prophylaxis, popPK tool use, provider decision making, and patient-reported outcomes.

resultsEighteen participants aged 6 to 39 years enrolled; half used extended half-life concentrates. Patient interest in their PK centered on general curiosity followed by a desire for participation in physical activity and decrease in infusion frequency. Providers used the WAPPS clinical calculator feature to simulate prophylaxis regimens under different dose, infusion, and trough conditions. Most targeted troughs were 1 to 3 IU/dL. The feasibility assessment demonstrated challenges with patient recruitment; however, the majority of participants successfully completed study assessments meeting feasibility targets.

conclusionA larger-scale study powered to evaluate the impact of PK-tailored prophylaxis on clinical and patient-reported outcomes is feasible with study design modifications to support increased recruitment rate. Shared decision making incorporating patient and provider goals is important and facilitated by regimen simulations with the clinical calculator.

Indexed as

decision makingfactor VIIIfeasibility studieshalf‐lifehemophilia Apharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32110764
PMCPMC7040534
OpenAlexW3004952421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.