Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110759›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2020

Dental extractions on direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin: The DENTST study.

Yvonne Brennan, Ying Gu, Mark Schifter, Helen Crowther, Emmanuel J Favaloro, Jennifer Curnow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Consideration of NOACs (novel or non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants) in dental procedure.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Dental extractions on direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin: The DENTST study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yvonne BrennanDepartment of Haematology Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-4070
Ying GuDepartment of Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Special Needs Dentistry Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW Australia.
Mark SchifterDepartment of Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Special Needs Dentistry Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW Australia.
Helen CrowtherDepartment of Haematology Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW Australia.
Emmanuel J FavaloroDiagnostic Haemostasis Laboratory Laboratory Haematology NSW Health Pathology Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2103-1661
Jennifer CurnowDepartment of Haematology Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConflicting recommendations exist addressing the management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for invasive dental procedures.

objectivesTo determine the safety of DOAC continuation compared to warfarin continuation for dental extractions with regards to bleeding outcomes.

methodsA single-center, prospective, cohort study was performed to compare 7-day bleeding outcomes between patients who continued their DOAC, and patients on warfarin with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 4.0. Blood tests including oral anticoagulant drug levels were measured immediately prior to extraction. The gauze used to apply pressure to the socket was weighed before and after extraction to estimate blood loss. Patients were contacted by phone 2 and 7 days after extraction.

resultsEighty-six patients on a DOAC had a total of 145 teeth extracted, and 21 patients on warfarin had 50 teeth extracted. There were no major bleeding events. The rate of minor plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was comparable between the DOAC and warfarin cohorts (36% and 43%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-1.98). Preextraction apixaban and dabigatran levels were comparable between bleeders and nonbleeders, while rivaroxaban levels were higher in those who bled. The weight change of gauze used to tamponade the socket was similar between the 2 cohorts.

conclusionDental extractions on patients continuing DOACs led to bleeding rates similar to patients on warfarin with an INR between 2.0 and 4.0. There is no need to adjust DOAC dosing prior to dental extractions.

Indexed as

anticoagulantsantithrombinsfactor Xa inhibitorsoral hemorrhagetooth extractionwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID32110759
PMCPMC7040537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.