Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110758›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2020

Patient-reported reasons for and predictors of noncompliance with compression stockings in a randomized trial of stockings to prevent postthrombotic syndrome.

Andrew J Dawson, Arash Akaberi, Jean-Philippe Galanaud, David R Morrison, Susan R Kahn, SOX Trial investigators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J DawsonDepartment of Medicine University of Montreal Montreal QC Canada.
Arash AkaberiCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Lady Davis Institute Montreal QC Canada.
Jean-Philippe GalanaudDepartment of Medicine Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
David R MorrisonCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Lady Davis Institute Montreal QC Canada.
Susan R KahnCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Lady Davis Institute Montreal QC Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-8916
SOX Trial investigators
Jewish General Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElastic compression stockings (ECSs) are used to treat symptoms of venous insufficiency. However, lack of patient compliance can limit their effectiveness. In a secondary analysis of the SOX Trial, a randomized trial of active vs. placebo ECSs worn for 2 years to prevent postthrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis, we aimed to describe patient-reported reasons for nondaily use of ECS and to identify predictors of noncompliance during follow-up.

methodsAt each follow-up visit of the SOX Trial, patients were asked how many days per week they wore study stockings, and if not worn daily, to specify the reason(s). Reasons for nondaily use of ECSs were tabulated. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of stocking noncompliance during follow-up (defined as use <3 days per week).

resultsAmong the 776 patients who attended at least 1 follow-up visit, daily use of stockings at each visit was similar in the active and placebo ECS groups. Reasons for nondaily use of stockings was most frequently related to aversive aspects of stockings (~three-fourths of patients) and less often related to patient behaviors (~one-fourth of patients). In multivariate analyses, behavior-related and aversive aspect-related reasons for nondaily use of ECSs at the 1-month visit were significant predictors of noncompliance during follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 4.41 [95% confidence interval, 2.12-9.17] and OR = 3.99 [2.62-6.08], respectively).

conclusionsAversive aspects of ECSs and patient behaviors are important reasons for noncompliance. Improving the appeal and tolerability of ECS and education directed at modifying patient behaviors may improve compliance.

Indexed as

adherencecompliancecompression stockingsdeep vein thrombosispostthrombotic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32110758
PMCPMC7040536
OpenAlexW2997815914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.