ArticlePrimate biology2019
Baboon induced pluripotent stem cell generation by
Article in Primate biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wisent Somatic Cells Resist Reprogramming by the PiggyBac Transposon System: A Case Study Highlighting Methodological and Conservation Hurdles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- An expedition in the jungle of pluripotent stem cells of non-human primates.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- The cytokine receptor CRLF3 is a human neuroprotective EV-3 (Epo) receptor.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Successful Derivation of Hepatoblasts, Cholangiocytes and Hepatocytes from Simian Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Non-human primate pluripotent stem cells for the preclinical testing of regenerative therapies.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- A piggyBac-based platform for genome editing and clonal rhesus macaque iPSC line derivation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical application of regenerative therapies using embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells is within reach. Progress made during recent years has encouraged researchers to address remaining open questions in order to finally translate experimental cell replacement therapies into application in patients. To achieve this, studies in translationally relevant animal models are required to make the final step to the clinic. In this context, the baboon (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.