ReviewVisceral medicine2020
Gender Differences in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Implications for Screening?
Review in Visceral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of selected atypical non-neuroendocrine cancers with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of clinical parameters and exosomal lncRNA NEAT1_1 in MEN1-related non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- HeterozygousAdvances in respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing Urinary Para-Hydroxyphenylacetic Acid as a Biomarker Candidate in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Review
- The Spectrum of Familial Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2023Review
- Beyond the "3 Ps": A critical appraisal of the non-endocrine manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- A narrative review of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes: genetics, clinical features, imaging findings, and diagnosis.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Hereditary Parathyroid Disease: Sometimes Pathologists Do Not Know What They Are Missing.Endocrine pathology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome gender-related differences have been reported in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), although not all reports are conclusive. This systematic review with analysis of the own MEN1 cohort evaluates gender differences and potential consequences for screening.
methodsA systematic review of the literature between 1990 and 2019 with the search terms "MEN1" or "multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1" and "gender" or "sex" was performed. In addition, the prospectively collected data of a genetically confirmed MEN1 cohort of the Philipps University Marburg were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsReview of the literature identified five retrospective case series with original data of 1,057 MEN1 patients. One series suggested a higher frequency of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), especially gastrinomas, in men (61 vs. 54%) and a higher frequency of pituitary tumors in women (47 vs. 30%), but others did not. Only thymic NEN occurred predominantly in men throughout all studies. Women with MEN1 were found to have an increased risk of breast cancer. In the own series consisting of 116 MEN1 patients (male = 58, female = 58), thymic lesions were also more frequently detected in male patients (male = 5, female = 1). No gender difference was found with regard to the other manifestations.
conclusionRegarding the typical MEN1 tumor manifestations, gender-adapted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches cannot be recommended. Female MEN1 patients should be encouraged to participate in breast cancer screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.