Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110650›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2020

Gender Differences in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Implications for Screening?

Jerena Manoharan, Carmen Bollmann, Peter Herbert Kann, Pietro Di Fazio, Detlef K Bartsch, Max B Albers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HeterozygousAdvances in respiratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerena ManoharanDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Carmen BollmannDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Peter Herbert KannDivision of Endocrinology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Pietro Di FazioDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Detlef K BartschDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Max B AlbersDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome gender-related differences have been reported in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), although not all reports are conclusive. This systematic review with analysis of the own MEN1 cohort evaluates gender differences and potential consequences for screening.

methodsA systematic review of the literature between 1990 and 2019 with the search terms "MEN1" or "multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1" and "gender" or "sex" was performed. In addition, the prospectively collected data of a genetically confirmed MEN1 cohort of the Philipps University Marburg were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsReview of the literature identified five retrospective case series with original data of 1,057 MEN1 patients. One series suggested a higher frequency of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), especially gastrinomas, in men (61 vs. 54%) and a higher frequency of pituitary tumors in women (47 vs. 30%), but others did not. Only thymic NEN occurred predominantly in men throughout all studies. Women with MEN1 were found to have an increased risk of breast cancer. In the own series consisting of 116 MEN1 patients (male = 58, female = 58), thymic lesions were also more frequently detected in male patients (male = 5, female = 1). No gender difference was found with regard to the other manifestations.

conclusionRegarding the typical MEN1 tumor manifestations, gender-adapted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches cannot be recommended. Female MEN1 patients should be encouraged to participate in breast cancer screening programs.

Indexed as

GenderMultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1Screening

Identifiers

PMID32110650
PMCPMC7036590
OpenAlexW3000883045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.