ArticlePeerJ2020
Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neglected kingdoms: the gut virome, mycobiome and their role in inflammatory bowel disease.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Characterization of Airborne Fungal Diversity in Nunavik Housing Using Activated Air Sampling.ACS ES&T air · 2026Article
- Unraveling yeast diversity in food fermentation using ITS1-2 amplicon-based metabarcoding.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Snapshot reflection of the seasonal resilience and diversity of fungal phylotypes in the tropical Ikogosi spring.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based assessment of the healthy human gut mycobiota landscape using ITS1 DNA metabarcoding data.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Limitations of Common Molecular Markers in Fungal Biodiversity Analysis and the Benefits of Their Synergistic Use.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Biogeography and host associations of Russula subsection Xerampelinae based on large-scale analysis of UNITE sequence data.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Phyllosphere microbiomes uncovered: Research trends, geographic disparities, and key microbial players.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of Post-Harvest Apple Scab on Peel Microbiota, Fermentation Dynamics, and the Volatile/Non-Volatile Composition of Cider.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- First Report on Antifungal Activity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficiency of the Coriolis µ Air Sampling Device for Fungal Contamination Analysis of Indoor Air: A Case Study.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protein Coding Low-CopyEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Pomegranate Woody Mycobiota Associated with Wood Decay.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterization and Health Risk Assessment of Airborne Fungi in a Semiunderground Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Advanced rDNA-Based Detection of Wheat Pathogens in Grain Samples Using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sarcocystis Cymruensis in the Brown Rat (Rattus Norvegicus) from an Urban District in Kuwait: Detailed Morphologic and Molecular Characterization.Acta parasitologica · 2025Article
- Multi-marker comparative analysis of 18S, ITS1, and ITS2 primers for human gut mycobiome profiling.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Soil microbiome dysbiosis and rhizosphere metabolic dysfunction drive continuous cropping obstacles ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Internal transcribed spacers enable species-level Metataxonomic analysis of ciliated protozoa.ISME communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the performance of two eukaryotic genomic ribosomal regions, ITS1 and ITS2, in describing fungal diversity in aerosol samples using amplicon-based High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS). Composting sites, biomethanization facilities, and dairy farms, all affected by the presence of fungi, were visited to collect air samples. The amplicon-based HTS approach is a target enrichment method that relies on the amplification of a specific target using particular primers before sequencing. Thus, the results are highly dependent on the quality of amplification. For this reason, the authors of this paper used a shotgun metagenomic approach to compare its outcome with the amplicon-based method. Indeed, shotgun metagenomic does not rely on any amplification prior to sequencing, because all genes are sequenced without a specific target. In addition, culture methods were added to the analyses in biomethanization and dairy farms samples to validate their contribution to fungal diversity of aerosols. The results obtained are unequivocal towards ITS1 outperformance to ITS2 in terms of richness, and taxonomic coverage. The differential abundance analysis did demonstrate that some taxa were exclusively detected only by ITS2, and vice-versa for ITS1. However, the shotgun metagenomic approach showed a taxonomic profile more resembling to ITS1 than ITS2. Based on these results, neither of the barcodes evaluated is perfect in terms of distinguishing all species. Using both barcodes offers a broader view of the fungal aerosol population. However, with the actual knowledge, the authors strongly recommend using ITS1 as a universal fungal barcode for quick general analyses of diversity and when limited financial resources are available, primarily due its ability to capture taxonomic profiles similar to those obtained using the shotgun metagenomic. The culture comparison with amplicon-based sequencing showed the complementarity of both approaches in describing the most abundant taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.