Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110479›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of the

Yong Zhou, Yuan Cheng, Chunpeng Wan, Jingwen Li, Youxin Yang, Jinyin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-Wide Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Identification of theBiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification and functional analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification and characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yong ZhouKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8432-6678
Yuan ChengZhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease Control, Institute of Vegetables, Hanghzou, Zhejiang, China.
Chunpeng WanKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6892-016X
Jingwen LiKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Youxin YangKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Jinyin ChenKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant DNA-binding with one finger (Dof) gene family is a class of plant-specific transcription factors that play vital roles in many biological processes and stress responses. In the present study, a total of 36

Indexed as

Abiotic stressDofExpression profilePhylogenetic analysisWatermelon

Identifiers

PMID32110479
PMCPMC7032062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.