Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110432›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

A type II implementation-effectiveness hybrid quasi-experimental pilot study of a clinical intervention to re-engage people living with HIV into care, 'Lost & Found': an implementation science protocol.

Joseph Cox, Blake Linthwaite, Kim Engler, David Lessard, Bertrand Lebouché, Nadine Kronfli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph Cox *1Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS), McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) - Glen Site, 1001, Decarie boulevard - D02.4110, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1 Canada.
Blake Linthwaite *1Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS), McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) - Glen Site, 1001, Decarie boulevard - D02.4110, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1 Canada.
Kim Engler2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), 2155 Guy Street, 5th Floor, Montreal, QC H3H 2R9 Canada.
David Lessard2Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), 2155 Guy Street, 5th Floor, Montreal, QC H3H 2R9 Canada.
Bertrand Lebouché1Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS), McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) - Glen Site, 1001, Decarie boulevard - D02.4110, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1 Canada.
Nadine Kronfli1Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS), McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) - Glen Site, 1001, Decarie boulevard - D02.4110, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), 10% of patients living with HIV do not return for care annually. Currently, no formal system exists to re-engage out-of-care (OOC) patients. Lost & Found, developed using an implementation science approach, is an intervention to re-engage OOC patients. It is based on existing evidence-based interventions and will be adapted for use by nurses at the MUHC. The aims of this study are to simultaneously assess both implementation and effectiveness of Lost & Found in order to determine the viability of a future multisite stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

methodsLost & Found consists of two core elements: identifying and contacting OOC patients. Based on formative work involving MUHC nurses, and the use of a combined implementation framework (enhanced Replicating Effective Programs, Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases, and Proctor et al.'s implementation outcomes), we will adapt the intervention to our clinic. Adaptations include the creation of an OOC risk prediction tool, an automated real-time OOC list, and prioritization of high-risk OOC patients for re-engagement. Delivery and ongoing adaptation of the intervention will follow a three-pronged implementation strategy consisting of (1) promoting adaptability; (2) planning, engaging, executing, evaluating, and reflecting cycles; and (3) internal facilitation. This 15-month quasi-experimental pilot study adopts a type II implementation-effectiveness hybrid design. To evaluate implementation, a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach will guide the mixing of qualitative and quantitative data at time points throughout the study. In addition, descriptive and pre-post analyses, for each of the implementation and sustainability phases, will inform evaluations of the cumulative effectiveness and sustainability of the Lost & Found intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will provide preliminary evidence for (1) the utility of our chosen implementation strategies and (2) the effectiveness of the intervention. Ultimately, this information may be used to inform future re-engagement efforts using implementation science in other HIV care centres. In addition, the procedures and measurement tools developed for this study will be foundational to the development of a multi-site, randomised stepped wedge study that would provide more robust evidence in support of the Lost & Found intervention.

Indexed as

HIVImplementation scienceImplementation strategiesLost to follow-upNursingOut-of-careRe-engagement

Identifiers

PMID32110432
PMCPMC7035655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.