ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2020
Determining the effectiveness of a cell phone-based student response system.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active Learning Strategies in Veterinary Medicine: A Literature Review.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the responses and understanding of students and teachers about the cell phone-based Socrative® application. Additionally, we compared the academic performance of the groups using Socrative with the one group that did not make use of this application.
methodsDuring the 50 min of each endocrine physiology lecture, traditional teaching took 40 min, whereas the last 10 min were reserved for Socrative. Following the lecture, students completed small Socrative-based quizzes on their smartphones. At the end of the module, students and teachers were asked for feedback and the students' test performances were evaluated. Data were examined by the SPSS version 20 for frequencies and gender/academic performance comparison.
resultsAs many as 87% of the students responded positively to Socrative; 85% felt that the activity was fun, 84% were more actively engaged, and 71% felt more motivated. Furthermore, 90% of the students agreed that this exercise enhanced their learning. Most students agreed that Socrative helped them enhance peer-to-peer and class discussions. Students' attitudes towards Socrative activity did not vary with respect to their gender or total screen time per day. Approximately 99% of the students preferred multiple-choice questions to true/false and short answers. Instructors perceived Socrative as an easy-to-use tool to generate discussions and assess the degree of understanding of their students. Socrative significantly enhanced exam performance.
conclusionCourse instructors are encouraged to incorporate mobile-based applications in their lectures, which may make students' learning more active, effective, and enjoyable, without increasing institutional expenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.