Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110173›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2020

Conducting a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitional Care Programmes: The Key Challenges and Recommendations.

Ke Xin Eh, Ian Yi Han Ang, Milawaty Nurjono, Sue-Anne Ee Shiow Toh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ke Xin EhSingapore Population Health Improvement Centre (SPHERiC), National University Health System, SG.
Ian Yi Han AngRegional Health System Office, National University Health System, SG.
Milawaty NurjonoCentre for Health Services Research and Policy Research (CHSPR), Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, SG.
Sue-Anne Ee Shiow TohRegional Health System Office, National University Health System, SG.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transitional care encompasses a range of services designed to promote care integration as patients transfer between different locations or different levels of care. Transitional care programmes have been proven to produce positive outcomes in reducing hospital readmissions and improving patients' health outcomes. However, little is known about the benefits of the programmes on healthcare cost and the published results have been inconsistent. With increasing healthcare expenditures and limited public healthcare resources, cost-benefit analyses become paramount in informing healthcare resource allocation decisions. This perspective paper describes the approaches used in estimating the total costs of a bundle of transitional care services from an academic medical centre, identifies the key methodological challenges encountered in the process of cost-benefit analysis, and recommends potential solutions to tackle these challenges. By providing a comprehensive perspective on the methodological challenges, this paper encourages program evaluators to take these possible challenges into consideration for future cost-benefit analyses.

Indexed as

cost-benefit analysishealth expendituresintegrated caremortalitypost-discharge caretransitional care

Identifiers

PMID32110173
PMCPMC7034318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.