Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110164›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2020

Preoperative Bowel Preparation in Minimally Invasive and Vaginal Gynecologic Surgery.

Michail Diakosavvas, Nikolaos Thomakos, Alexandros Psarris, Zacharias Fasoulakis, Marianna Theodora, Dimitrios Haidopoulos, Alexandros Rodolakis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michail Diakosavvas1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1104-7739
Nikolaos Thomakos1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alexandros Psarris1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Zacharias Fasoulakis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0216-3420
Marianna Theodora1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios Haidopoulos1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alexandros Rodolakis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bowel preparation traditionally refers to the removal of bowel contents via mechanical cleansing measures. Although it has been a common practice for more than 70 years, its use is based mostly on expert opinion rather than solid evidence. Mechanical bowel preparation in minimally invasive and vaginal gynecologic surgery is strongly debated, since many studies have not confirmed its effectiveness, neither in reducing postoperative infectious morbidity nor in improving surgeons' performance. A comprehensive search of Medline/PubMed and the Cochrane Library Database was conducted, for related articles up to June 2019, including terms such as "mechanical bowel preparation," "vaginal surgery," "minimally invasive," and "gynecology." We aimed to determine the best practice regarding bowel preparation before these surgical approaches. In previous studies, bowel preparation was evaluated only via mechanical measures. The identified randomized trials in laparoscopic approach and in vaginal surgery were 8 and 4, respectively. Most of them compare different types of preparation, with patients being separated into groups of oral laxatives, rectal measures (enema), low residue diet, and fasting. The outcomes of interest are the quality of the surgical field, postoperative infectious complications, length of hospital stay, and patients' comfort during the whole procedure. The results are almost identical regardless of the procedure's type. Routine administration of bowel preparation seems to offer no advantage to any of the objectives mentioned above. Taking into consideration the fact that in most gynecologic cases there is minimal probability of bowel intraluminal entry and, thus, low surgical site infection rates, most scientific societies have issued guidelines against the use of any bowel preparation regimen before laparoscopic or vaginal surgery. Nonetheless, surgeons still do not use a specific pattern and continue ordering them. However, according to recent evidence, preoperative bowel preparation of any type should be omitted prior to minimally invasive and vaginal gynecologic surgeries.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPreoperative CareFemaleHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentVagina

Identifiers

PMID32110164
PMCPMC7042550
OpenAlexW3006176622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.